Apparently, Picasso’s father was in great awe of his son’s talent. By the age of 13, he began studies at the School of Fine Arts in Barcelona, where his father taught. Two years later, Picasso completed his first painting, ‘The Picador’. Picasso’s father was a strict academic who believed that artists should learn by copying the great masters. He began teaching his son when Picasso was 7 years old. Picasso’s father, José Ruiz y Blasco, a painter and art teacher, was Picasso’s first major indluence. The art works are highly valued especially from significant artists such as Pablo Picasso.Considered as the ‘father of Cubist art, most of the world knows him only as ‘Picasso,’ and His real name is a real tongue twister – Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Martyr Patricio Clito Ruíz y Picasso – a whopping 23 words! Its initial criticism is no longer held in current individuals and the movement had a significant part in the development of artistic styles. In modern society cubism is an accepted art form within the art community. Some Cubist paintings are Glass of Beer and Playing Cards by Juan Gris Guernica by Pablo Picasso Improvisation by Andrew Dasburg and many others. Many artist followed the Cubist movement, influenced by the new style of painting the looked at the simplified geometric forms of everyday life. Picasso used these subjects as his focus for his Cubism paintings. These subjects were also found to be used in many new styles of modernistic art movements however they have been constructed differently in each movement. They focused their paintings on simple human subjects, landscapes and towns, however the dominating subject matter used in Cubist paintings was still-life. Many Cubist artists paint subjects relevant to their everyday world (natural or man-made). These new approaches to Cubism allow Cubist artist to reconstruct their subject differently through the Analytical and Synthetic cubist styles. Synthetic Cubism was developed between 19, it was composed of different textures, surfaces, collage elements and a large variety of merged subject matter this is what characterises Synthetic Cubism. Synthetic Cubism was the later phase within Cubism that looked at the experimental nature of collage. This does not apply to all Analytic Cubist paintings as some used similar tones of colour to create a more unified surface on the painting. The brushwork in some Analytic Cubist paintings emphasized the contrast between the light and darker tones. Art critics originally used the term Cubism as an insult to their simplistic designs. Analytic Cubist artist made use of the basic geometric shapes: pyramids, cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones to represent the natural world. The fractured, geometric forms muted colours and undefined edges of their subject are what characterizes Analytic Cubist artworks. After looking at the subject from every possible angle a Cubist artist pieces together fragments from various viewpoints simultaneously on to one painting. Colour was almost absent from these paintings except for the use of dull colours. The distinction between Synthetic Cubism and Analytic Cubism was that Analytic Cubists analyse the subjects form and re-constructs the subject with geometric shapes. Picasso’s ideas and influences lead him to approach art in a new style now known as the Cubism movement.Ĭubist paintings were not meant to be realistic or life-like in any way, instead they revolutionized conventional still life landscape and portrait paintings through their abstracted ideas and artworks.Īnalytic Cubism is one of the two phases within Cubism and was developed between 19. Picasso reconstructs the subject with different segments that allow his viewers to see all angles of his subject. In a representation the artist takes what they see and paints it on canvas. Picasso wanted to construct an image rather than represent it, like his influence Paul Cenzanne. Using colours and shapes to create a harmonious depiction. Picasso drew inspiration and unlike Cezanne he didn’t use the simplified shapes and sharp lines to add depth but to break down the subject into other geometric forms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |